Billion Dollar ByBit Hack: $1.4 Billion Stolen by Lazarus Group

On February 20, 2025, a seismic event jolted the crypto world. Hackers stole $1.4 billion from ByBit, a top-tier exchange. Experts quickly pointed fingers at the Lazarus Group, a notorious North Korean hacking crew. This breach ranks among the largest crypto heists ever, sparking urgent questions about security. Today, February 22, we dive into the ByBit hack in February 2025, breaking it down for intermediate readers. Buckle up for a wild ride through the details, suspects, and fallout!

What Went Down: The ByBit Breach Unraveled

ByBit confirmed the hack on February 20, 2025. Attackers targeted an Ethereum cold wallet during a routine transfer. They tricked the system with a fake interface, masking the theft. Within hours, $1.4 billion in Ethereum and related tokens vanished. ByBit’s CEO, Ben Zhou, announced the breach on X, reassuring users. Meanwhile, the exchange locked down operations to limit damage.

Bybit is Solvent even if this hack loss is not recovered, all of clients assets are 1 to 1 backed, we can cover the loss.

Consequently, panic spread fast among traders. Over 350,000 withdrawal requests flooded ByBit in just 10 hours. However, the exchange processed them smoothly, thanks to quick loans from peers. For intermediate readers, this shows how vulnerable even “secure” wallets can be. Hackers moved smarter and faster than expected.

Who’s Behind It: Meet the Lazarus Group

The Lazarus Group, a North Korean hacking outfit, emerged as the prime suspect. On February 21, crypto sleuth ZachXBT linked the attack to them. He used on-chain data, spotting familiar wallet patterns. Arkham Intelligence confirmed this, awarding ZachXBT a $31,500 bounty. Their proof? Test transactions tied to past Lazarus heists, like the Phemex breach.

Moreover, Lazarus has a notorious track record. They stole $625 million from Ronin Network in 2022. Experts estimate they’ve nabbed over $2 billion in crypto since 2021. North Korea funds its regime with these hacks, dodging sanctions.

How They Did It: A Sneaky, Sophisticated Strike

The hackers exploited ByBit’s multi-signature wallet system. They faked the signing interface, confusing the team. Signers approved a malicious transaction, thinking it was legit. Next, the attackers drained 401,347 ETH to a single wallet. Then, they split it into chunks, laundering through decentralized exchanges.

Additionally, this “blind signing” trick isn’t new. It hit Radiant Capital and WazirX before, exposing a weak spot. For intermediate folks, this highlights a key lesson: software interfaces can betray you. The sophistication stunned even seasoned analysts. ByBit’s team acted fast, but the damage was done.

Market Fallout: Trust Takes a Hit

The ByBit hack in February 2025 rattled the crypto market. Ethereum’s price dipped 4% as stolen funds moved. Bitcoin and altcoins felt the tremors too, with market cap sliding briefly. Meanwhile, ByBit’s ETH reserves crashed from 443,000 to 39,000 ETH. Yet, the exchange stayed afloat with $172.5 million in loans from Bitget and Binance.

Furthermore, trust in centralized exchanges wobbled. Users rushed to withdraw funds, fearing another FTX-style collapse. However, ByBit’s CEO insisted they’re solvent, with $20 billion in assets left. Intermediate readers might see this as a tipping point. Could decentralized platforms gain ground now?

Fighting Back: ByBit’s Response and Industry Support

ByBit sprang into action after the hack. They reported it to authorities and teamed up with analytics firms. Consequently, they traced some funds, blacklisting attacker addresses across chains. CEO Ben Zhou promised full reimbursement via reserves and loans.

Additionally, the crypto community rallied. KuCoin and OKX offered support, stressing unity against cybercrime. Industry leaders like Coinbase’s Conor Grogan downplayed contagion fears. For intermediate readers, this teamwork shows resilience. Still, it’s a race against time to recover anything.

Lazarus Group’s Bigger Game: A Geopolitical Twist

Why does Lazarus keep hitting crypto? North Korea uses these funds to bankroll weapons and bypass sanctions. The $1.4 billion haul could buy a lot on the black market. Moreover, their attacks are getting bolder and smarter. The U.S. and allies have tracked them for years, but stopping them proves tough.

Interestingly, this hack’s scale dwarfs past efforts. It’s not just about money—it’s a power play. Intermediate readers might wonder: can crypto stay safe from state-backed threats? The stakes keep rising.

12 hr from the worst hack in history. ALL withdraws have been processed. Our withdraw system is now fully back to normal pace, you can withdraw any amount and experience no delays. Thanks for your patience and we are sorry that this has happened.
Bybit will come out with full…

What’s Next: Lessons and Warnings

The ByBit hack in February 2025 leaves lasting echoes. Exchanges must beef up security—think multi-sig upgrades and AI monitoring. Users should lean on hardware wallets and 2FA, reducing reliance on platforms. Meanwhile, regulators might tighten rules, eyeing this as a wake-up call. The industry can’t ignore this anymore.

Ultimately, this saga tests crypto’s grit. Can it bounce back from a $1.4 billion gut punch? For intermediate readers, it’s a chance to rethink strategies. Stay sharp—hackers like Lazarus won’t stop. The crypto wild west just got wilder.

*Disclaimer: News content provided by Genfinity is intended solely for informational purposes. While we strive to deliver accurate and up-to-date information, we do not offer financial or legal advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with qualified professionals before making any financial or legal decisions. Genfinity disclaims any responsibility for actions taken based on the information presented in our articles. Our commitment is to share knowledge, foster discussion, and contribute to a better understanding of the topics covered in our articles. We advise our readers to exercise caution and diligence when seeking information or making decisions based on the content we provide.