Lauren Sanchez shows off her curves on yacht trip hours after Jeff Bezos controversy erupts

Lauren Sanchez was in fine form as she showed off her figure in a pink cut-out mini dress while enjoying a shopping spree in St. Barts on Thursday.

The 55-year-old was soaking up the sun as she spent time with her friend October Gonzalez. This comes after she spent several days on fiance Jeff Bezos' $500 million superyacht, before deciding to head to the shore to get some shopping in.

Sanchez turned heads in her pink dress, which had cut-outs on each side in the midriff area.

She completed her look with white sandals, a black purse and aviator sunglasses as she headed to designer stores like Prada, Dolce & Gabbana and Louis Vuitton.

As for October, who is married to Sanchez's ex Tony Gonzalez, she wore a red and white patterned shirt and shorts with a black biking top underneath.

Sanchez rests while Bezos deals with controversy

While Sanchez was off enjoying herself, Bezos was in headlines for very different reasons after Washington Post award-winning editorial cartoonist Ann Telneas announced she was resigning from the newspaper after more than a decade.

She stated she made the decision after the Post nixed her drawing of Jeff, along with other tech moguls, kneeling before a statue of Donald Trump.

"I've worked for the Washington Post since 2008 as an editorial cartoonist," Ann wrote in a statement shared to Substack.

"I have had editorial feedback and productive conversations - and some differences - about cartoons I have submitted for publication, but in all that time I've never had a cartoon killed because of who or what I chose to aim my pen at. Until now."

Facebook and Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg, AI CEO Sam Altman, LA Times publisher Patrick Soon-Shiong, and the Disney character Mickey Mouse were all drawn kneeling before the statue.

Some were holding up bags of money, while one puckered their lips as if asking for a kiss from Donald.

"There have been multiple articles recently about these men with lucrative government contracts and an interest in eliminating regulations making their way to Mar-a-Lago," she added.

"While it isn't uncommon for editorial page editors to object to visual metaphors within a cartoon if it strikes that editor as unclear or isn't correctly conveying the message intended by the cartoonist, such editorial criticism was not the case regarding this cartoon. 

"To be clear, there have been instances where sketches have been rejected or revisions requested, but never because of the point of view inherent in the cartoon's commentary. That's a game changer... and dangerous for a free press."