4 hours ago
5
Jay-Z’s legal fight continues full throttle. His team is continuing to challenge the allegations in a high-profile lawsuit claiming that the rapper raped a 13-year-old girl at a celebrity afterparty alongside Diddy. In a recent motion filed by Jay-Z’s attorney, Alex Spiro, the defense argued that the lawyer representing the alleged victim, Tony Buzbee, “got basic facts wrong” in his statements and court filings. The new court documents outline Jay-Z’s legal team’s response to the accusations, asserting discrepancies and calling for accountability.
In the motion, Spiro addressed a key point: the father of Jane Doe, the alleged victim, reportedly has no recollection of the incident in question. The father has denied Buzbee’s claims that he drove 10 hours from Rochester to New York City to retrieve his daughter following the alleged assault. Spiro further suggested that Buzbee should face sanctions for presenting an inaccurate testimony on behalf of the plaintiff. “Mr. Carter seeks only to hold Mr. Buzbee to the ethical standards that constrain any responsible attorney who would solemnly sign his name to allegations in court,” Spiro stated in the motion.
This is not the first time Jay-Z’s legal team has sought to dismiss the case. On January 8th, Spiro filed an initial attempt to dismiss the lawsuit, using the opportunity to highlight multiple inconsistencies in Buzbee’s statements. Spiro called for sanctions against the plaintiff’s lawyer for what he described as “misleading” statements in his filings.
Here’s what Buzbee said in his response filed on January 22nd, where he defended his approach, claiming that he had thoroughly verified the accuracy of the alleged victim’s story. “I ran a background check on the plaintiff and retained a retired police detective to research and confirm other aspects of the plaintiff’s account,” Buzbee stated.
In reply, Spiro criticized Buzbee’s claims, stating that none of the individuals involved in the alleged verification process had been named or presented as witnesses. “Nor does the Opposition specify which ‘aspects’ of Plaintiff’s complaint were ‘fact-checked,’” Spiro countered in the new letter.
Buzbee, in turn, dismissed Spiro’s response, describing the defense filings as “frantic” and “desperate.” He also emphasized that the case was legitimate and pointed out that no one is above the law, asserting that Jay-Z’s motion to dismiss was “frivolous.”
As the case continues to unfold, both sides appear ready for a lengthy legal battle. The outcome of the lawsuit remains uncertain, but the exchange of legal challenges and accusations has become increasingly heated.
English (US) ·